Dr. Bharathi Bavaharan, B12665, Dr. Rohit Shetty, Dr. Naresh
Kumar Yadav, Dr. Santosh Gopi Krishna Gadde
INTRODUCTION:
Age related macular degeneration (AMD) is one of the leading causes of blindness among the older age group1,2. The disease has two stages, dry and wet stage. Formation of drusen, Retinal Pigment Epithelium (RPE) dysfunction, geographical atrophy of RPE and photoreceptors, accumulation of fluids in the intra-retinal and/or sub-retinal space, choroidal neovascularization and sub-retinal fibrosis are the pathological developments in the disease.2 In retina, the outer blood retinal barrier function is maintained by the RPEwhich controls the transport of water as well as nutrients between the neurosensory retina and the fenestrated choroid 3,4. Dysfunction and atrophy of the RPE layer causes the breakdown of this barrier function resulting into the accumulation of fluids into the sub-retinal and intra-retinal space. In the severe stage (wet-AMD), there is development of choroidal neovascular membranes (CNVM) which further contribute to the accumulation of fluids into the retina. VEGF is one of the most well studied and potent factor driving the pathogenesis in AMD5,6 and hence served as the first molecular therapeutic target.
The more severe stages of the disease are managed by using single or multiple therapeutic approaches which include the use of laser mediated photocoagulation, intravitreal corticosteroids and intravitreal anti-VEGF injections7-9. Despite multiple and/or targeted molecular therapeutic options available, there is a subset of patients (19.6% to 67.4% as per different studies testing the efficiency of the different anti-VEGF drugs and dosages like CATT, HORIZON, VISION, IVAN, ANCHOR, MARINA,FOCUS) which does not respond to the therapy or develops resistance to it10-13.
Studies suggest the involvement of alternate molecules (FGF, PDGF) and pathways involved in the development of resistance to anti-VEGF or persistence of clinical pathology despite treatment14-16. Hence, identifying additional factors which impacts disease prognosis is essential. Various body fluids such as plasma, tears, aqueous humor (AH) and vitreous humor (VH) are being studied at various disease stages to determine novel factors and their possible role in mediating the choroidal neovascularization and edema in AMD patients17-19. The identification of systemically dysregulated soluble factors such as from serum/plasma may not be representatives of the retinal conditions in the disease. Vitreous humor being in closest proximity to the affected area would serve as more appropriate choice of sample, however it may not be available for all the stages of the disease and/or for multiple sampling and the collection method is more invasive and risky20. However, these studies have not been conclusive and there is a need to determine dysregulated molecules in the eye at closer proximity to the retina and further study their association with the treatment response. Further, there is still a dearth of knowledge as to the list of molecular factors that could possibly impact treatment outcomes in CNVM. Hence, this study address to fill this gap and pave way for potential additional therapeutics in the management of CNVM.
OBJECTIVE:
The objective of this study is to determine the association between the soluble factors in aqueous humor samples and the treatment response in CNVM patients in terms of edema resolution
METHODS:
The cross-sectional study following approval by the Institutional Review Board was performed as per guidelines stipulated by the Indian Council for Medical Research (ICMR). Subjects were recruited for the study post informed written consent as per institutional and ethics board guidelines and as referred to our institute. CNVM patients receiving therapy were classified as persistent and resolving based on the measurement of the macular edema volume. Resolving:were the patients with reduction in macular edema volume in the 2nd visit than the 1st visit/baseline after intravitreal injection. Persistent: were the patients with increased or no reduction in macular edema volume in the 2nd visit than the 1st visit after intravitreal injections.
Aqueous humour (AH):
was collected by anterior chamber paracentesis where a syringe with 30 mm gauge needle was used to access the anterior chamber through the peripheral cornea to aspirate at least 50μL of AH. This procedure was performed in subjects underdoing surgical intervention (as part of standard of care) that would require access into anterior chamber of the eye. All the samples were stored at -80°C until further processed.
Soluble factors:
The selection of the soluble factors was based on the available literature on the involvement of soluble factors in mediating the pathological features such as neovascularization and edema.The concentrations of the mentioned chemokines in aqueous humor samples were measured with Cytometric Bead Array (CBA). The acquisition of processed samples was done on FACS Canto-II (BD Biosciences) and the quantification was performed with FCAP Array software (Version 3.0).
Statistical analysis:
Relevant statistical analysis (distribution analysis, t-test, Mann Whitney test, Pearson correlation coefficient) was performed following experiments using GraphPad Prism software.
Clinical parameters: The clinical parameters such as measurement of edema volume, Central Subfield Thickness (CST) and retina volume were measured from Spectral Domain-Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT). Heidelberg OCT software (Spectralis HRA+OCT) was used to measure CST and retina volume. The edema volume was calculated using MATLAB 8.5, The Mathworks, Inc., Massachusetts, USA software.
RESULTS:
Statistical significance was calculated for the aqueous humor soluble factor concentrations between the resolving and the persistent group of patients. There was a marked reduction in the concentration of VEGF in the persistent group than the resolving edema group, which can be the result of the anti-VEGF injections administered. sICAM-1, sVCAM, sL-selectin and CXCL10 are soluble cell adhesion molecules which play a role in the inflammatory response through aiding the transmigration of immune cells, were found to be significantly higher in the persistent group than the resolving group. CXCL9 and IL-8 was observed to have an inverse relationship with difference in the central foveal thickness between the visits. sICAM, sVCAM, sL-selectin and IL-2 exhibited positive correlation with difference in the edema volume between two visits. The higher levels of these factors indicate the possible role of these soluble factors in mediating the pathogenesis and/or poor response to the therapy.The reduction in CFT for the resolving group correlated with lower levels of soluble factors suggesting that a subgroup of soluble immune factors may be responsible for poor therapeutic outcomes or preventing the resolution of edema
DISCUSSION:
Metabolic dysregulations, hypoxiaand oxidative stress drive the pathogenesis of AMD21,22. As a consequence of the stressed retina, the inflammatory pathways are activated, which further contribute to the development of AMD17,21-23. In order to determine the molecular factors that are instrumental in the disease pathogenesis and patients response to the administered drug, several studies have been directed towards identification of dysregulated soluble factors in the retina having a potential to contribute to the neovascularization and vascular permeability or edema17,18,24-27.The studies have been directed towards identification of the dysregulated factors in the disease than control subjects25,26 and/or assessing their associations with the disease severity in AMD24. Previous studies have also profiled AH soluble factors to assess their potential in mediating macular edema in diabetic macular edema patients, however it has not been studied in AMD.28,29Cell adhesion molecules such as ICAM, VCAM are known to play a vital role in the inflammatory response by mediating the arrest and transmigration of the activated circulating immune cells to the site of injury30.Higher levels of these factors are seen in retinal diseases such as diabetic retinopathy, 31AMD, diabetic macular edema.25,32 Previous studies have shown the higher levels of sICAM-1 are associated with the sub-retinal fluid height as well as disease severity in diabetic macular edema32-34.Concentrations of these inflammatory markers in aqueous humor and their association with the treatment response is studied in diabetic macular edema28,29. However, the association was not studied in AMD. Our current findings with high levels of certain molecular factors in patient group with lack of edema resolution will be explored for its causal role in rending this resistance to therapy. Following which further evaluation of these soluble factors influencing the treatment response needs to be studied for its potential use as therapeutic targets.
REFERENCES:
1 Hellman, J. & Yiu, G. Age-Related Macular Degeneration. (2018).
2 Mitchell P1, L. G., Gopinath B2, Wong TY3. Age-related macular degeneration. Lancet392, 1147-1159, doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31550-2. (2018).
3 Sparrow, J. R., Hicks, D. & Hamel, C. P. The retinal pigment epithelium in health and disease. Current molecular medicine10, 802-823 (2010).
4 Daruich, A. et al. Mechanisms of macular edema: Beyond the surface. Progress in retinal and eye research63, 20-68, doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.10.006 (2018).
5 Spilsbury, K., Garrett, K. L., Shen, W. Y., Constable, I. J. & Rakoczy, P. E. Overexpression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the retinal pigment epithelium leads to the development of choroidal neovascularization. The American journal of pathology157, 135-144, doi:10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64525-7 (2000).
6 Ishibashi, T. et al. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in experimental choroidal neovascularization. Graefe’s archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie235, 159-167 (1997).
7 Lai, K. & Landa, G. Current choice of treatments for neovascular AMD. Expert review of clinical pharmacology8, 135-140, doi:10.1586/17512433.2015.990379 (2015).
8 Su, Y., Wu, J. & Gu, Y. Photodynamic therapy in combination with ranibizumab versus ranibizumab monotherapy for wet age-related macular degeneration: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy22, 263-273, doi:10.1016/j.pdpdt.2018.05.002 (2018).
9 Pilar Calvo1, Antonio Ferreras1,2, Fadwa Al Adel3, Yao Wang4, Michael H Brent3,4. Dexamethasone intravitreal implant as adjunct therapy for patients with wet age-related macular degeneration with incomplete response to ranibizumab. bjopthalmol99, doi:10.1136/bjopthalmol (2015).
10 Yang, S., Zhao, J. & Sun, X. Resistance to anti-VEGF therapy in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a comprehensive review. Drug design, development and therapy10, 1857-1867, doi:10.2147/DDDT.S97653 (2016).
11 Rofagha, S. et al. Seven-year outcomes in ranibizumab-treated patients in ANCHOR, MARINA, and HORIZON: a multicenter cohort study (SEVEN-UP). Ophthalmology120, 2292-2299, doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.03.046 (2013).
12 Jacob, J. et al. Six-year outcomes in neovascular age-related macular degeneration with ranibizumab. International journal of ophthalmology10, 81-90, doi:10.18240/ijo.2017.01.14 (2017).
13 Ozkaya, A. et al. Five-year Outcomes of Ranibizumab in Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration: Real Life Clinical Experience. Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO31, 424-430, doi:10.3341/kjo.2016.0125 (2017).
14 Cabral, T. et al. Retinal and choroidal angiogenesis: a review of new targets. International journal of retina and vitreous3, 31, doi:10.1186/s40942-017-0084-9 (2017).
15 Ishikawa, M., Jin, D., Sawada, Y., Abe, S. & Yoshitomi, T. Future therapies of wet age-related macular degeneration. Journal of ophthalmology2015, 138070, doi:10.1155/2015/138070 (2015).
16 Kaiser, P. K. Emerging therapies for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: drugs in the pipeline. Ophthalmology120, S11-15, doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.01.061 (2013).
17 Stanton, C. M. & Wright, A. F. Inflammatory biomarkers for AMD. Advances in experimental medicine and biology801, 251-257, doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3209-8_32 (2014).
18 Nath, M., Halder, N. & Velpandian, T. Circulating biomarkers in glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration, and diabetic retinopathy. Indian journal of ophthalmology65, 191-197, doi:10.4103/ijo.IJO_866_16 (2017).
19 Lambert, N. G. et al. Risk factors and biomarkers of age-related macular degeneration. Progress in retinal and eye research54, 64-102, doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2016.04.003 (2016).
20 Tominaga, A. et al. Bacterial contamination of the vitreous cavity associated with transconjunctival 25-gauge microincision vitrectomy surgery. Ophthalmology117, 811-817 e811, doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.09.030 (2010).
21 Marilita M. Moschos, E. N., 2 & Irini P. Chatziralli, a. C. A. D. Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Pathogenesis, GeneticBackground, and the Role of Nutritional SupplementsJournal of ChemistryVolume 2014, 9 pages, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/317536 (2014).
22 Ambati, J., Atkinson, J. P. & Gelfand, B. D. Immunology of age-related macular degeneration. Nature reviews. Immunology13, 438-451, doi:10.1038/nri3459 (2013).
23 NOWAK, J. Z. AMD – THE RETINAL DISEASE WITH AN UNPRECISED ETIOPATHOGENESIS:IN SEARCH OF EFFECTIVE THERAPEUTICS. Acta Poloniae Pharmaceutica ñ Drug Research, Vol. 71 900-916 (2014).
24 Spindler, J., Zandi, S., Pfister, I. B., Gerhardt, C. & Garweg, J. G. Cytokine profiles in the aqueous humor and serum of patients with dry and treated wet age-related macular degeneration. PloS one13, e0203337, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0203337 (2018).
25 Liu, F. et al. Aqueous humor cytokine profiling in patients with wet AMD. Molecular vision22, 352-361 (2016).
26 Mimura, T. et al. Aqueous Humor Levels of Cytokines in Patients with Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Ophthalmologica. Journal international d’ophtalmologie. International journal of ophthalmology. Zeitschrift fur Augenheilkunde, 1-9, doi:10.1159/000490153 (2018).
27 Ghasemi, H., Ghazanfari, T., Yaraee, R., Faghihzadeh, S. & Hassan, Z. M. Roles of IL-8 in ocular inflammations: a review. Ocular immunology and inflammation19, 401-412, doi:10.3109/09273948.2011.618902 (2011).
28 Hillier, R. J. et al. Aqueous Humor Cytokine Levels and Anatomic Response to Intravitreal Ranibizumab in Diabetic Macular Edema. JAMA ophthalmology136, 382-388, doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.0179 (2018).
29 Bressler, N. M. et al. Persistent Macular Thickening Following Intravitreous Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, or Ranibizumab for Central-Involved Diabetic Macular Edema With Vision Impairment: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA ophthalmology136, 257-269, doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.6565 (2018).
30 Crane, I. J. L., J. Semin. Mechanisms of leukocyte migration across the blood–retina barrier. Immunopathol30, 165-177, doi:doi.org/10.1007/s00281-008-0106-7 (2008).
31 Rusnak, S. et al. The Measurement of Intraocular Biomarkers in Various Stages of Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Using Multiplex xMAP Technology. Journal of ophthalmology2015, 424783, doi:10.1155/2015/424783 (2015).
32 Hillier, R. J. et al. Aqueous Humor Cytokine Levels as Biomarkers of Disease Severity in Diabetic Macular Edema. Retina37, 761-769, doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000001210 (2017).
33 Zhu, D., Zhu, H., Wang, C. & Yang, D. Intraocular soluble intracellular adhesion molecule-1 correlates with subretinal fluid height of diabetic macular edema. Indian journal of ophthalmology62, 295-298, doi:10.4103/0301-4738.111184 (2014).
34 Jonas, J. B., Jonas, R. A., Neumaier, M. & Findeisen, P. Cytokine concentration in aqueous humor of eyes with diabetic macular edema. Retina32, 2150-2157, doi:10.1097/IAE.0b013e3182576d07 (2012).


Leave a Comment